Enhancing Well Log Data Prediction in the Drava Basin

In an article published in the journal Applied Sciences, researchers confirmed the reliability of predictive regression algorithms in filling missing geophysical logging data in the Drava Super Basin, particularly Gola Field. They evaluated tree-based and boosting algorithms for prediction accuracy and used long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks to improve predictions for blind datasets. Unsupervised machine learning (ML) effectively distinguished lithological variations, aiding in understanding subsurface lithological relations in well log datasets from 20 wells.

Image Credit: vectorfusionart/Shutterstock.comImage Credit: vectorfusionart/Shutterstock.com

Background

Well logging data is crucial for characterizing subsurface properties, especially in complex regions like the Drava Basin. Previous research has applied ML techniques to identify lithofacies and characterize reservoirs. However, many studies have faced limitations due to incomplete or poor-quality well logs. Specific challenges arise from the complex lithology and sparse data in the Croatian region of the Drava Basin.

This study aimed to address these gaps by applying 17 ML algorithms, including tree-based, boosting, and LSTM neural networks, to predict missing well-log data and improve lithological characterization. Focusing on the Gola Field, the research also employed unsupervised learning for lithology pattern recognition. By recreating missing logs and analyzing lithology with advanced ML techniques, this study provided a more reliable and detailed understanding of the subsurface relations, significantly improving over previous methodologies.

Data Preparation and Machine Learning Methodology

The researchers investigated the use of ML algorithms to predict missing well log data and analyze lithological patterns in the Drava Basin, focusing on the Gola Field. The dataset comprised well log data from 20 wells. Various logs were available, including density, acoustic, neutron, gamma rays, and resistivity. Data preparation involved handling inconsistencies, duplicate measurements, and outliers, followed by normalization and standardization.

The authors employed 17 regression models to predict acoustic logs, using a combination of supervised learning models, such as LSTM neural networks, and unsupervised clustering algorithms to understand spatial distributions. The models were evaluated using performance metrics like mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R2).

Clustering algorithms, including K-means, Gaussian mixture, spectral clustering, agglomerative clustering, and mean shift, were used to group data based on patterns, with the number of clusters optimized using the silhouette method. The research confirmed the lithology patterns, identifying nine different sandstone bodies.

All analyses were conducted using Python, leveraging libraries like scikit-learn, pandas, NumPy, and lasio. The results demonstrated the potential of ML techniques in improving lithological characterization and filling gaps in well-log data, offering a more reliable understanding of subsurface relations in the Drava Basin.

Prediction and Clustering Performance Results

Baseline regression models were tested on a blind dataset from a well in the same field but furthest from the training wells. After parameter optimization, grid search cross-validation and Bayesian optimization were used to enhance model performance. The artificial neural network, particularly with LSTM layers, performed best on unseen data, achieving a 0.73 R2. This model showed high prediction accuracy across different parts of the Drava Basin, indicating its potential for generalized use.

Clustering algorithms identified lithological patterns, recognizing distinct sandstone properties. The LSTM model, built using TensorFlow, effectively handled missing data, predicting acoustic, density, and neutron logs with high correlation to measured values. Clustering methods, validated by well WH data, revealed optimal grouping of Neogene sediments, accurately distinguishing Pliocene deposits and various sandstone bodies. The blue cluster, associated with higher resistivities, indicated potential gas-bearing reservoirs.

Analysis and Interpretation

The study demonstrated that regression ML algorithms effectively predicted well logs, particularly acoustic logs, with over 80% correlation on test datasets. Tree-based algorithms, boosting algorithms, and neural networks, including LSTM, showed over 90% correlation. Blind data predictions were lower but still displayed significant trendlines. Neural networks, especially LSTM, performed best on unseen data, achieving up to 45% correlation for acoustic values.

Clusters defined by a majority of the clustering algorithms used in the selected well WH. Image Credit: ‌https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/14/6039
Clusters defined by a majority of the clustering algorithms used in the selected well WH. Image Credit: ‌https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/14/6039

Unsupervised clustering algorithms successfully identified lithological patterns with five to 12 clusters, with 10 clusters optimally representing sandstone bodies. The results indicated that ML models can accurately predict well-log values and lithological properties, aiding in interpreting subsurface patterns and regional relations in the Drava Basin.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the researchers confirmed the reliability of predictive regression algorithms in filling missing geophysical logging data in the Drava Super Basin, particularly Gola Field. Evaluating 17 ML algorithms, including tree-based, boosting, and LSTM neural networks, the researchers successfully predicted well logs and improved lithological characterization.

The artificial neural network, especially with LSTM layers, achieved the highest prediction accuracy on unseen data, demonstrating the potential for generalized use. Unsupervised clustering algorithms effectively distinguished lithological patterns, aiding in understanding subsurface relations.

The findings showed that ML models could accurately predict well-log values and lithological properties, providing a more reliable and detailed understanding of the Drava Basin's subsurface, especially in complex regions with sparse data. This study significantly advanced previous methodologies, offering improved subsurface characterization and interpretation.

Journal reference:
  • Brcković et al., 2024Enhancing the Understanding of Subsurface Relations: Machine Learning Approaches for Well Data Analysis in the Drava Basin, Pannonian Super Basin. Applied Sciences14(14), 6039. DOI: 10.3390/app14146039, ‌https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/14/6039

Article Revisions

  • Aug 15 2024 - General improvements to readability and fixed broken journal paper link.
Soham Nandi

Written by

Soham Nandi

Soham Nandi is a technical writer based in Memari, India. His academic background is in Computer Science Engineering, specializing in Artificial Intelligence and Machine learning. He has extensive experience in Data Analytics, Machine Learning, and Python. He has worked on group projects that required the implementation of Computer Vision, Image Classification, and App Development.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Nandi, Soham. (2024, August 14). Enhancing Well Log Data Prediction in the Drava Basin. AZoAi. Retrieved on October 18, 2024 from https://www.azoai.com/news/20240721/Enhancing-Well-Log-Data-Prediction-in-the-Drava-Basin.aspx.

  • MLA

    Nandi, Soham. "Enhancing Well Log Data Prediction in the Drava Basin". AZoAi. 18 October 2024. <https://www.azoai.com/news/20240721/Enhancing-Well-Log-Data-Prediction-in-the-Drava-Basin.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Nandi, Soham. "Enhancing Well Log Data Prediction in the Drava Basin". AZoAi. https://www.azoai.com/news/20240721/Enhancing-Well-Log-Data-Prediction-in-the-Drava-Basin.aspx. (accessed October 18, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Nandi, Soham. 2024. Enhancing Well Log Data Prediction in the Drava Basin. AZoAi, viewed 18 October 2024, https://www.azoai.com/news/20240721/Enhancing-Well-Log-Data-Prediction-in-the-Drava-Basin.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoAi.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Machine Learning Models Predict Arsenic Contamination