Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning

In a paper published in the journal Scientific Reports, researchers investigated deep learning (DL) models for predicting carbon dioxide (CO2) solubility in ionic liquids (ILs), which are highly effective for capturing CO2. They used a comprehensive dataset covering various ILs under different temperature and pressure conditions.

Study: Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning. Image Credit: chayanuphol/Shutterstock
Study: Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning. Image Credit: chayanuphol/Shutterstock

The study implemented robust deep neural network models—artificial neural network (ANN) and long short-term memory (LSTM)—showing high accuracy. The ANN proved more computationally efficient than the LSTM, with global sensitivity analysis emphasizing their utility in CO2 solubility prediction and IL screening for CO2 capture.

Background

Past work has extensively explored using machine learning (ML) models to predict CO2 solubility in ILs, leveraging various algorithms and datasets. Traditional CO2 capture methods like amine scrubbing face limitations due to high energy demands and significant solvent loss.

In recent years, ILs have emerged as a promising alternative for CO2   capture, offering benefits such as low vapor pressure and customizable molecular structures. However, ILs often have high viscosity, which poses a challenge for practical applications in CO2 capture.

CO2 Solubility Prediction

This study utilizes a dataset of CO2 solubility in ILs originally collected by Venkatraman and Alsberg and meticulously pre-processed by Song et al. for machine learning model training. The dataset includes 10,116 data points with 53 features predicting CO2 solubility in 124 ILs, covering a temperature range of 243.2 K to 453.15 K and a pressure range of 0.00798 bar to 499 bar.

The ILs consist of various cations, such as imidazolium, pyridinium, ammonium, and anions, including tetrafluoroborate and hexafluorophosphate. The data is divided into training (80%) and testing (20%) sets, with 10% of the training data reserved for validation to monitor validation loss and prevent overfitting.

The study focuses on developing DL models, specifically an ANN and a LSTM network, for predicting CO2 solubility in ILs. The ANN model, inspired by biological neurons, consists of one input layer, one output layer, and three hidden layers with 64 neurons each.

Due to their computational efficiency, rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation functions are used for hidden and output layers. In contrast, the LSTM model, an extension of the recurrent neural network (RNN), is designed to handle long-term dependencies and consists of an input layer, two hidden layers with 64 neurons, and an output layer. The LSTM's structure includes memory cells and gates to manage long-term information, making it suitable for sequential data analysis in CO2 solubility prediction.

Sobol sensitivity analysis, a variance-based method, assesses parameter contributions and interactions by calculating first-order and total-order sensitivity indices. It aims to quantify the relative importance of each parameter in influencing model output variance. Morris sensitivity analysis complements this by using an elementary effects approach, perturbing parameters one at a time to gauge their average influence and variability on CO2 solubility predictions. Model reliability and accuracy are further evaluated through key statistical indexes ensuring robustness for practical applications.

Neural Network Comparison

The performance efficiency in predicting CO2 solubility varied across different models, necessitating an optimal choice of optimizer to enhance the neural network models' attributes. Based on Ruder's comprehensive review recommending 'Adam' as a superior optimizer, it was employed with ReLU activation functions to achieve optimized efficiency.

The learning rate was set to 0.001 to ensure effective learning without causing under or overestimation. The ideal number of neurons per hidden layer, starting from 8 and increasing to 64 per layer, resulted in an ANN model with three hidden layers, capturing complex patterns and generalizing well to new data, with an R2 of 0.986 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.0171.

The LSTM model, configured with dual layers of 64 neurons each and employing the "tanh" activation function with Adam optimizer (learning rate 0.001), performed well over 280 epochs with a batch size 16. Both models exhibited strong predictive accuracy for CO2 solubility, with minimal deviations and consistent error distributions. Global sensitivity analysis using Sobol and Morris methods highlighted pressure as the predominant factor influencing solubility. The ANN model balanced high accuracy, computational efficiency, and interpretability, contrasting with the LSTM model's higher computational costs.

Conclusion

To sum up, this study explored DL models for predicting CO2 solubility in ionic liquids (ILs), using a dataset of over 10,116 measurements across 164 ILs under varied conditions. Two models, an ANN and LSTM network, underwent thorough hyperparameter tuning and validation.

The ANN achieved an R2 of 0.985 in 4 minutes with 535 MiB memory usage, outperforming prior studies with a 13% lower error rate. Sobol and Morris's sensitivity analyses highlighted pressure and temperature as critical factors influencing CO2 solubility, supporting experimental findings. Overall, the study advances CO2 capture research by demonstrating the ANN's efficiency and accuracy, setting a precedent for future material science applications.

Journal reference:
Silpaja Chandrasekar

Written by

Silpaja Chandrasekar

Dr. Silpaja Chandrasekar has a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Anna University, Chennai. Her research expertise lies in analyzing traffic parameters under challenging environmental conditions. Additionally, she has gained valuable exposure to diverse research areas, such as detection, tracking, classification, medical image analysis, cancer cell detection, chemistry, and Hamiltonian walks.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. (2024, July 04). Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning. AZoAi. Retrieved on July 07, 2024 from https://www.azoai.com/news/20240704/Predicting-CO2-Solubility-in-Ionic-Liquids-Using-Deep-Learning.aspx.

  • MLA

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning". AZoAi. 07 July 2024. <https://www.azoai.com/news/20240704/Predicting-CO2-Solubility-in-Ionic-Liquids-Using-Deep-Learning.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. "Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning". AZoAi. https://www.azoai.com/news/20240704/Predicting-CO2-Solubility-in-Ionic-Liquids-Using-Deep-Learning.aspx. (accessed July 07, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Chandrasekar, Silpaja. 2024. Predicting CO2 Solubility in Ionic Liquids Using Deep Learning. AZoAi, viewed 07 July 2024, https://www.azoai.com/news/20240704/Predicting-CO2-Solubility-in-Ionic-Liquids-Using-Deep-Learning.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoAi.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Enhanced CAD Integration Using Deep Learning