Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers

In an article published in the journal Remote Sensing, researchers investigated the effectiveness of the rotating fan beam scatterometer for polar sea ice detection by developing and employing a Bayesian approach. The results signified the potency of rotating fan beam scatterometers for polar tracking.

Study: Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers. Image credit: Generated using DALL.E.3
Study: Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers. Image credit: Generated using DALL.E.3

Background

Sea ice is pivotal in global climate models and is essential for accurate ocean surface wind data retrieval. Given that the polar regions are predominantly characterized by the presence of sea ice and open water, conducting a thorough analysis of polar sea ice properties is crucial. Satellite scatterometers have proven invaluable for monitoring these regions, thanks to their swift coverage, relatively high spatial resolution, and minimal sensitivity to atmospheric conditions. These active microwave systems are extensively used for ocean-related applications, including sea ice monitoring. However, due to their distinct scattering mechanisms, distinguishing between sea ice and open water backscatter signals has been a persistent challenge.

In recent years, rotating fan beam scatterometers like the China France Oceanography Satellite scatterometer (CSCAT) have emerged, offering a more diverse range of azimuth sampling and incidence angles. This innovative technology provides an opportunity to significantly improve sea ice monitoring in polar regions, contributing to the development of long-term records and advancing our understanding of these critical areas. The researchers of the present study explored the CSCAT using a Bayesian approach that considers CSCAT’s geometric characteristics to effectively detect polar sea ice.

About the study

CSCAT is a pivotal instrument operating at Ku-band frequency. It utilizes vertically and horizontally polarized fan beams to scan a substantial 1000 km swath of the Earth's surface. This advanced system uses a conical scanning mechanism to capture data at intermediate incidence angles. CSCAT efficiently generates 40 slices with a fine 10 km range resolution, providing a wealth of backscatter data for analysis. Its scientific data products include L1B data, encompassing σ0 slices and geolocations, L2A data with average backscatter values, and L2B data, which contains crucial sea surface wind information. This data is particularly significant for the sea ice detection process.

The sea ice detection algorithm for CSCAT was built on a robust Bayesian framework. This sophisticated method leverages dual polarizations and the multiple incidence angles of CSCAT for precise sea ice detection. The algorithm's workflow includes defining the CSCAT backscatter space, estimating the sea ice Geophysical Model Function (GMF), and calculating Bayesian posterior probabilities. The GMF for sea ice is established using CSCAT data, taking into account seasonal and regional variations. The algorithm narrows down the incidence angle range to 30°–49°, a selection grounded in stability and the representation of sea ice characteristics.

Furthermore, the sea ice detection algorithm involves a meticulous examination of backscatter distances. It employed Gaussian fitting to model these distances and assessed probability distribution functions. The Minimum Square Distance (MLE) between observed backscatters and the sea ice GMF is calculated, introducing a chi-square distribution with varying degrees of freedom based on the number of measurement pairs (N). Ultimately, the Bayesian algorithm yields posterior probabilities for sea ice detection, integrating MLE and an array of probabilities to effectively identify sea ice within CSCAT data. This sequential and comprehensive approach ensures the accurate detection of sea ice with CSCAT, delivering valuable insights into polar regions.

Study Results

The sea ice detection algorithm was diligently applied to create sea ice masks and posterior probability maps daily for the entire CSCAT mission duration from 2019 to 2022. To authenticate the accuracy of these sea ice detection results of CSCAT, a quantitative evaluation was conducted by comparing them with the microwave sea ice concentration database. In this regard, the Bayesian posterior probabilities derived from CSCAT data were projected onto Polar Stereographic Projection maps. By setting a threshold at 55%, the sea ice mask was distinctly defined, distinguishing sea ice from open water.

The validation process primarily relied on two reference datasets: the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/National Snow and Ice Data Center (NOAA/NIDC) and the European Meteorological Satellite (EUMETSAT) OSI SAF SSMIS sea ice concentration data. Through rigorous analysis, it was ascertained that CSCAT sea ice edges align remarkably well with those from AMSR2, particularly when a sea ice concentration of 15% was applied. Quantitative assessments of sea ice extent consistently revealed a close agreement between CSCAT and NSIDC AMSR2 in both the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, validating the efficacy of CSCAT's sea ice detection algorithm. The overall standard deviation difference between these datasets was less than 0.3 million square kilometers, indicating robust alignment.

Conclusion

To sum up, the researchers explored the capabilities of the first spaceborne Ku-band rotating fan beam scatterometer, CSCAT, for polar sea ice detection. A Bayesian approach incorporating multiple incidence angles and dual polarization characteristics of CSCAT was developed. The algorithm successfully produced daily sea ice posterior probabilities and masks throughout the mission period (2019–2022).

Validation against reference datasets, including NSIDC AMSR2 and OSI SAF SSMIS and AMSR2, demonstrated the accuracy of CSCAT sea ice detection. The results revealed excellent agreement between CSCAT and NSIDC AMSR2 sea ice edges and consistently low differences in sea ice extents. This research thus confirmed the effectiveness of rotating fan beam scatterometers for polar sea ice monitoring.

Journal reference:
Susha Cheriyedath

Written by

Susha Cheriyedath

Susha is a scientific communication professional holding a Master's degree in Biochemistry, with expertise in Microbiology, Physiology, Biotechnology, and Nutrition. After a two-year tenure as a lecturer from 2000 to 2002, where she mentored undergraduates studying Biochemistry, she transitioned into editorial roles within scientific publishing. She has accumulated nearly two decades of experience in medical communication, assuming diverse roles in research, writing, editing, and editorial management.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. (2023, October 25). Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers. AZoAi. Retrieved on December 26, 2024 from https://www.azoai.com/news/20231025/Polar-Sea-Ice-Detection-Using-Rotating-Fan-Beam-Scatterometers.aspx.

  • MLA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers". AZoAi. 26 December 2024. <https://www.azoai.com/news/20231025/Polar-Sea-Ice-Detection-Using-Rotating-Fan-Beam-Scatterometers.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers". AZoAi. https://www.azoai.com/news/20231025/Polar-Sea-Ice-Detection-Using-Rotating-Fan-Beam-Scatterometers.aspx. (accessed December 26, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Cheriyedath, Susha. 2023. Polar Sea Ice Detection Using Rotating Fan Beam Scatterometers. AZoAi, viewed 26 December 2024, https://www.azoai.com/news/20231025/Polar-Sea-Ice-Detection-Using-Rotating-Fan-Beam-Scatterometers.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of AZoAi.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
WoodYOLO Outperforms Cutting-Edge Models in Microscopic Wood Fiber Analysis