Artificial intelligence (AI) involves the use of systems or machines that simulate human intelligence to perform real-world tasks. These AI systems are trained with data and learn from their experiences to solve specific problems, continuously improving their performance over time.
Image credit: TippaPatt/Shutterstock
AI finds applications in diverse areas, including advanced web search engines, automated driving cars, games, human speech recognition, recommendation systems, and healthcare. However, as AI systems become more complex, there is a growing need for transparency and explainability. Users must be able to understand how these systems arrive at their decisions and detect any potential biases or errors.
Understanding complex AI systems has become a significant challenge, especially with the rise of machine learning models, particularly deep neural networks (DNNs). These models are often referred to as “black boxes” due to their opacity, making it difficult for humans to comprehend the reasoning behind their decisions.
In response to this challenge, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods have emerged to make these black-box models more interpretable to human users. The goal of XAI is to provide understandable explanations of AI model processes and outcomes, thereby building user trust and facilitating model improvement. XAI methods can be knowledge-driven or data-driven, with various approaches such as intrinsic models and post-hoc explanations.
Interpretability of AI systems
The interpretability of AI models has significant implications in various domains, including ethics, accountability, and user trust. As XAI continues to develop, it will play a vital role in addressing concerns and fostering transparent and trustworthy AI systems in the future.
In contemporary times, black-box AI systems are prevalent in autonomous vehicles, social networks, and medical domains, making decisions without providing reasons behind them. While not all black-box AI systems require explanations, interpretability is necessary in situations where unacceptable outcomes can lead to significant consequences or when transparency is essential for building trust.
Distinguishing Explainability from Interpretability
In the literature, “explainability” and “interpretability” lack a unified definition. Though they are used interchangeably, selected papers offer distinct meanings. For example, interpretability relates to providing explanations, while explainability includes all actions to explain. Another view sees interpretability as the ability to explain in understandable terms and explainability as a comprehensible interface between humans and decision-makers.
The following definitions are useful to provide clarity: Explainability offers insights to meet the specific needs for a targeted audience, while interpretability gauges how well these insights align with the audience’s domain knowledge. Explainability generates insights (e.g., text explanations, feature relevance) for experts, end-users, or odelling experts. In contrast, interpretability assesses if explanations match the audience’s knowledge, support decisions, and align with the model’s output. However, the definition of interpretability may vary based on the problem domain and user type.
XAI Techniques
Various XAI methods have been studied to improve the interpretability of AI models in different domains. These methods include Shapely Additive exPlanations (SHAP), Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME), Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), Layer-wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), Fuzzy Classifier, and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP).
The Fuzzy Classifier utilizes fuzzy logic to mimic human decision-making by assigning different opportunities between “yes” and “no” responses. Grad-CAM is an enhanced version of class activation mapping, providing localization maps to highlight significant regions in medical imaging and clinics. LRP generates heatmaps based on relevance scores, while LIME generates local explanations by perturbing input data and observing model predictions.
PDPs plot the effects of feature subsets on model predictions, and SHAP calculates significance values for each feature. SHAP uses game theory to improve the interpretability and explainability of DL models. These methods have been applied in various fields, such as healthcare, social media, finance, and agriculture, to make AI models more transparent and trustworthy.
Applications of XAI
XAI has been explored in various domains, such as agriculture, computer vision, finance, forecasting, healthcare, remote sensing, signal processing, and social media. In agriculture, DL models were utilized to detect leaf disease classification, and a residual network (ResNet)-attention model with interpretable methods achieved high accuracy rates in different experiments. In computer vision, XAI has been applied to tasks such as malware detection, image manipulation detection, vibration signal analysis, and gait classification.
In finance, XAI methods help predict credit card default applications and improve the quality of reason codes from neural network models. In forecasting, semantic and AI technologies were combined to provide explanations for demand forecasting, and XAI methods were used for signal analysis and Alzheimer’s disease detection.
In healthcare, XAI has been instrumental in predicting myocardial infarction, skin cancers, and coronary artery disease, among others. It has also been applied to brain image analysis, cardiac disorder recognition, stroke detection, lung cancer visualization, and clinical risk prediction.
Remote sensing and signal processing have benefited from optimal data augmentation methods, XAI techniques for remote sensing classification, and explanations for vehicle sound quality detection. Social media analysis has employed XAI to detect hate speech, deepfake audio, and fake news. It has also been used in food delivery service recommendation systems.
Overall, XAI has proven to be a valuable tool for improving the interpretability and trustworthiness of AI models in diverse applications across different domains. These studies underscore the significance of XAI in making AI systems more transparent and accountable to users and stakeholders.
Limitations and Challenges of XAI
Balancing Explainability and Performance: One significant drawback of XAI techniques is their potential impact on performance. Some XAI models may sacrifice accuracy compared to less transparent, more complex models. Striking the right balance between explainability and performance depends on specific application needs and requirements.
Challenges in Scalability and Complexity: Explainable AI faces difficulties with scalability and complexity. As AI models grow larger and more intricate, understanding their inner workings and the factors influencing decisions becomes increasingly challenging. This is particularly prominent in deep learning models that can have millions of parameters.
Human Factors and Cognitive Biases: Human comprehension and cognitive biases also affect XAI. People may struggle to understand AI system outputs despite the provided explanations. Additionally, cognitive biases can influence how individuals interpret AI system explanations, leading to potential misinterpretations.
Regulatory and Legal Considerations: AI system usage is subject to various regulatory and legal frameworks, including data privacy, security, and ethical concerns. Interpretability plays a crucial role in ensuring AI systems adhere to these frameworks. However, the lack of established standards and regulations for AI interpretability presents challenges in implementing and evaluating AI systems across diverse contexts.
These limitations and challenges underscore the need for continuous research and development in XAI. Exploring new techniques while balancing explainability and performance is essential. Moreover, considering broader societal, ethical, and legal implications and developing appropriate regulatory frameworks will ensure the safe and ethical use of AI systems.
Future Directions
Advancements in Machine Learning and AI: Continued progress in machine learning and AI will drive the development of XAI. As AI models become more complex, devising novel techniques for interpreting or explaining their behavior becomes crucial. There is substantial potential for creating more explainable deep learning models.
Multidisciplinary Approaches and Collaborations: Addressing interpretability requires collaboration among experts from diverse fields such as computer science, statistics, psychology, and cognitive science. Future research is likely to embrace more multidisciplinary approaches and foster increased collaboration between researchers, industry, and the government.
Ethical and Social Implications of XAI: XAI carries ethical and social implications. As AI systems become more widespread and powerful, ensuring transparency, accountability, and trustworthiness is vital. Ongoing research into the ethical and social aspects of XAI and the development of appropriate regulatory frameworks are essential for the safe and ethical usage of AI systems.
Reference and Further Readings
1. Shalom Akhai. (2023). From Black Boxes to Transparent Machines: The Quest for Explainable AI. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4390887
2. Saranya A., Subhashini R. (2023). A systematic review of Explainable Artificial Intelligence models and applications: Recent developments and future trends. Decision Analytics Journal. Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100230
3. Albahri, A.S. et al. (2023). A systematic review of trustworthy and explainable artificial intelligence in healthcare: Assessment of quality, bias risk, and data fusion. Information Fusion. 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.03.008